People v. Arnone
This text of 728 N.W.2d 866 (People v. Arnone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Kimberly Ann ARNONE, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 7, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered. We DIRECT the Monroe County Prosecuting Attorney and the Child Support Division of the Office of Attorney General to answer Issue III in the defendant's application for leave to appeal within 21 days after the date of this order. Those answers should address: (1) whether the defendant's contention regarding Issue III of her application is correct; (2) whether the disposition of the Court of Appeals is consistent with that court's disposition in People v. Davis, Docket No. 269074 (4/25/06); and (3) whether the cases cited in the Davis order, People v. Dunbar, 264 Mich.App. 240, 256 n. 15, 690 N.W.2d 476 (2004), and People v. Nowicki, 213 Mich.App. 383, 386-388, 539 N.W.2d 590 (1995), were correctly decided.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
728 N.W.2d 866, 2007 WL 957538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-arnone-mich-2007.