People v. Arnold
110 A.D.3d 730, 971 N.Y.S.2d 884
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Arnold. Read the opinion of the Court — 85 A.D.3d 1330 →
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from three sentences of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Firetog, J.), all imposed September 25, 2008, on the ground that the sentences are excessive.
Ordered that the sentences are affirmed.
The sentences imposed were not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Eng, P.J., Skelos, Roman, Cohen and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Arnold, 110 A.D.3d 730, 971 N.Y.S.2d 884 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).
110 A.D.3d 730 (People v. Arnold) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)