People v. Arnett

Michigan Supreme Court

People v. Arnett

872 N.W.2d 496, 498 Mich. 954

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided December 23, 2015·No. No. 151694; Court of Appeals No. 320095·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we vacate that part of the Court of Appeals judgment addressing the defendant’s witness-vouching and associated ineffective-assistance arguments, and we remand this case to the Court of Appeals to further consider those arguments under the principles set forth in People v Douglas, 496 Mich 557 (2014). In all other respects, leave to appeal is denied, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we vacate that part of the Court of Appeals judgment addressing the defendant’s witness-vouching and associated ineffective-assistance arguments, and we remand this case to the Court of Appeals to further consider those arguments under the principles set forth in People v Douglas, 496 Mich 557 (2014). In all other respects, leave to appeal is denied, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

People v. Arnett, 872 N.W.2d 496, 498 Mich. 954 (Mich. 2015).

Pincite

872 N.W.2d 496 (People v. Arnett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related