People v. Armstrong
This text of 26 A.D.3d 339 (People v. Armstrong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gary, J.), rendered January 18, 2002, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the trial court failed to adequately address his claim that a juror had slept through the first day of testimony is not preserved for appellate review (see People v Hicks, 6 NY3d 737 [2005]; People v Gonzalez, 247 AD2d 328, 329 [1998]). We decline to exercise our interest of justice jurisdiction to address the claim (see CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). Crane, J.P., Goldstein, Lifson and Dillon, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 A.D.3d 339, 807 N.Y.S.2d 881, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-armstrong-nyappdiv-2006.