People v. Armstrong

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Armstrong

267 A.D.2d 122, 699 N.Y.S.2d 690, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13028

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 16, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 267 A.D.2d 122 (People v. Armstrong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Armstrong, 267 A.D.2d 122, 699 N.Y.S.2d 690, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13028 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), rendered June 13, 1995, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree (4 counts), and sentencing him to four terms of 9 to 18 years, to run concurrently with each other and with the sentences imposed for the Bronx County convictions, and from an order, same court and Justice, entered on or about April 30, 1998, denying defendant’s motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate the judgment of conviction, unanimously affirmed.

In view of our affirmance of defendant’s Bronx conviction (267 AD2d 120 [decided herewith]), we find no basis for reversal. Moreover, it was understood by defendant at the time this plea was taken that it was separate and unrelated to the Bronx plea. Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Tom, Rubin, Andrias and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), rendered June 13, 1995, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree (4 counts), and sentencing him to four terms of 9 to 18 years, to run concurrently with each other and with the sentences imposed for the Bronx County convictions, and from an order, same court and Justice, entered on or about April 30, 1998, denying defendant’s motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate the judgment of conviction, unanimously affirmed.

In view of our affirmance of defendant’s Bronx conviction (267 AD2d 120 [decided herewith]), we find no basis for reversal. Moreover, it was understood by defendant at the time this plea was taken that it was separate and unrelated to the Bronx plea. Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Tom, Rubin, Andrias and Buckley, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

267 A.D.2d 122, 699 N.Y.S.2d 690, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13028, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-armstrong-nyappdiv-1999.