People v. Armstrong
917 N.W.2d 395
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 12, 2018
DocketSC: 157174; COA: 332793
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 917 N.W.2d 395 (People v. Armstrong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
People v. Armstrong, 917 N.W.2d 395 (Mich. 2018).
Opinion
On order of the Court, the motion to file pro per supplement is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the December 14, 2017 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Armstrong v. Douglas
W.D. Michigan, 2025
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
917 N.W.2d 395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-armstrong-mich-2018.