People v. Armstead

204 A.D.3d 521, 164 N.Y.S.3d 814, 2022 NY Slip Op 02515
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 19, 2022
DocketInd. No. 239/16 Appeal No. 15745 Case No. 2019-4277
StatusPublished

This text of 204 A.D.3d 521 (People v. Armstead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Armstead, 204 A.D.3d 521, 164 N.Y.S.3d 814, 2022 NY Slip Op 02515 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

People v Armstead (2022 NY Slip Op 02515)
People v Armstead
2022 NY Slip Op 02515
Decided on April 19, 2022
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: April 19, 2022
Before: Gische, J.P., Webber, Scarpulla, Rodriguez, Higgitt, JJ.

Ind. No. 239/16 Appeal No. 15745 Case No. 2019-4277

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Shavaughn Armstead, Defendant-Appellant.


Janet E. Sabel, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Laura Boyd of counsel), for appellant.

Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Molly Morgan of counsel), for respondent.



Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ronald A. Zweibel, J. at suppression motion; Mark Dwyer, J. at plea and sentencing), rendered March 8, 2019, convicting defendant of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and sentencing her to a term of 3½ years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant made a valid waiver of her right to appeal (see People v Thomas, 34 NY3 545 [2019], cert denied 589 US &mdash, 140 S Ct 2634 [2020]; People v Bryant, 28 NY3d 1094, 1096 [2016]). "The oral colloquy, taken together with a detailed written waiver, sufficiently explained that the waiver was comprehensive, and the explanation was not misleading" (People v Daniels, 198 AD3d 578, 578 [1st Dept 2021], lv denied 37 NY3d 1160 [2022] [internal citation omitted]). Defendant confirmed on the record that

she understood the waiver, and had discussed it with her attorney (see Thomas, 34 NY3d at 560). The waiver forecloses review of defendant's suppression claim.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: April 19, 2022



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Bryant
68 N.E.3d 60 (New York Court of Appeals, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
204 A.D.3d 521, 164 N.Y.S.3d 814, 2022 NY Slip Op 02515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-armstead-nyappdiv-2022.