People v. Armstead

68 A.D.3d 778, 888 N.Y.2d 910
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 1, 2009·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]; People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342 [2007]), we nevertheless accord great deference to the jury’s opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor (see People v Mateo, 2 NY3d 383, 410 [2004], cert denied 542 US 946 [2004]; People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 [2006]). Dillon, J.P., Florio, Miller and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Armstead, 68 A.D.3d 778, 888 N.Y.2d 910 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

68 A.D.3d 778 (People v. Armstead) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Armstead
85 A.D.3d 1193 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)