People v. Arjun
This text of 187 N.Y.S.3d 342 (People v. Arjun) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| People v Arjun |
| 2023 NY Slip Op 02532 |
| Decided on May 10, 2023 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on May 10, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
HECTOR D. LASALLE, P.J.
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
LINDA CHRISTOPHER
JANICE A. TAYLOR, JJ.
2019-06975
(Ind. No. 2026/16)
v
Shamdai Arjun, appellant.
Stephen N. Preziosi, New York, NY, for appellant.
Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (Johnnette Traill, William H. Branigan, and Amanda Iannuzzi of counsel), for respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated November 25, 2020 (People v Arjun, 188 AD3d 1235), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered June 3, 2019.
ORDERED that the application is denied.
The appellant has failed to establish that she was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277).
LASALLE, P.J., MALTESE, CHRISTOPHER and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Maria T. Fasulo
Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
187 N.Y.S.3d 342, 2023 NY Slip Op 02532, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-arjun-nyappdiv-2023.