People v. Arevalo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Arevalo

71 A.D.3d 688, 894 N.Y.S.2d 912

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Arevalo. Read the opinion of the Court — 54 A.D.3d 380 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 2, 2010·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kohm, J.), rendered January 18, 2007, convicting him of attempted rape in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The Supreme Court erroneously sustained the prosecutor’s objections to certain proposed testimony by the defendant (see People v Kass, 59 AD3d 77, 86-87 [2008]). The error, however, was harmless (see People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230 [1975]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Prudenti, P.J., Dillon, Eng and Roman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kohm, J.), rendered January 18, 2007, convicting him of attempted rape in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The Supreme Court erroneously sustained the prosecutor’s objections to certain proposed testimony by the defendant (see People v Kass, 59 AD3d 77, 86-87 [2008]). The error, however, was harmless (see People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230 [1975]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Prudenti, P.J., Dillon, Eng and Roman, JJ., concur.

People v. Arevalo, 71 A.D.3d 688, 894 N.Y.S.2d 912 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

71 A.D.3d 688 (People v. Arevalo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related