Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Arevalo

People v. Arevalo

71 A.D.3d 688, 894 N.Y.S.2d 912
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 2, 2010
StatusPublished

This text of 71 A.D.3d 688 (People v. Arevalo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Arevalo, 71 A.D.3d 688, 894 N.Y.S.2d 912 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kohm, J.), rendered January 18, 2007, convicting him of attempted rape in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The Supreme Court erroneously sustained the prosecutor’s objections to certain proposed testimony by the defendant (see People v Kass, 59 AD3d 77, 86-87 [2008]). The error, however, was harmless (see People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230 [1975]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Prudenti, P.J., Dillon, Eng and Roman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Crimmins
326 N.E.2d 787 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
People v. Kass
59 A.D.3d 77 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
71 A.D.3d 688, 894 N.Y.S.2d 912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-arevalo-nyappdiv-2010.