People v. Arenas

229 A.D.2d 445, 644 N.Y.S.2d 900, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7656

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Fisher, J.), rendered October 13, 1994, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to defendant’s contention, the record does not reveal a "tacit understanding” between the prosecutor and the defendant’s accomplice to reduce the accomplice’s sentence in exchange for testifying against the defendant (see, People v Cwikla, 46 NY2d 434). The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review, without merit or do not require reversal. Pizzuto, J. P., Santucci, Altman and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Arenas, 229 A.D.2d 445, 644 N.Y.S.2d 900, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7656 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

229 A.D.2d 445 (People v. Arenas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Cwikla
386 N.E.2d 1070 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)