People v. Ardito
This text of 446 N.E.2d 778 (People v. Ardito) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice John Carro at the Appellate Division (86 AD2d 144). In addition, we note that the District Attorney conceded on oral argument that there is no remaining evidence which would support a conviction of the defendant and therefore dismissal of the indictment is appropriate (cf. People v Bouton, 50 NY2d 130, 136; People v Malagon, 50 NY2d 954).
[844]*844Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg, Meyer and Simons.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
446 N.E.2d 778, 58 N.Y.2d 842, 460 N.Y.S.2d 22, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 2841, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ardito-ny-1983.