People v. Arcuri
97 A.D.3d 836, 948 N.Y.2d 561
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 25, 2012·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-267 [2011]; People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738 [2006]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]; People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 735 [1998]; People v Foy, 89 AD3d 1103, 1103 [2011]; People v Pertillar, 37 AD3d 740 [2007]). Mastro, A.P.J., Dillon, Eng, Lott and Miller, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Arcuri, 97 A.D.3d 836, 948 N.Y.2d 561 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).
97 A.D.3d 836 (People v. Arcuri) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Henry
2018 NY Slip Op 6561 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)