Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Arcuri

People v. Arcuri

97 A.D.3d 836, 948 N.Y.2d 561
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 25, 2012
StatusPublished

This text of 97 A.D.3d 836 (People v. Arcuri) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Arcuri, 97 A.D.3d 836, 948 N.Y.2d 561 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-267 [2011]; People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738 [2006]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]; People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 735 [1998]; People v Foy, 89 AD3d 1103, 1103 [2011]; People v Pertillar, 37 AD3d 740 [2007]). Mastro, A.P.J., Dillon, Eng, Lott and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Hidalgo
698 N.E.2d 46 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Ramos
853 N.E.2d 222 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Pertillar
37 A.D.3d 740 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Foy
89 A.D.3d 1103 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 A.D.3d 836, 948 N.Y.2d 561, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-arcuri-nyappdiv-2012.