People v. Archer

2025 NY Slip Op 03582
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 11, 2025·No. 2021-06339·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

People v Archer (2025 NY Slip Op 03582)
People v Archer
2025 NY Slip Op 03582
Decided on June 11, 2025
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on June 11, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
HECTOR D. LASALLE, P.J.
MARK C. DILLON
LINDA CHRISTOPHER
CARL J. LANDICINO, JJ.

2021-06339
2021-06636
(Ind. No. 382/19; S.C.I. No. 33/21)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Vladimir Archer, appellant.


Alex Smith, Middletown, NY, for appellant.

Brian P. Conaty, Special District Attorney, Monticello, NY (Danielle K. Blackaby of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeals by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Orange County (Hyun Chin Kim, J., at pleas; William L. DeProspo, J., at sentences), both rendered July 15, 2021, convicting him of course of sexual conduct against a child in the first degree and criminal sexual act in the first degree under Indictment No. 382/19, and use of a child in a sexual performance and possession of a sexual performance by a child under Superior Court Information No. 33/21, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

ORDERED that the judgments are affirmed.

The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248). The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his contention that the sentences imposed were excessive (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d at 255), as well as his contention that the sentences violated his constitutional rights against cruel and unusual punishment (see People v Escobargarcia, 237 AD3d 1221, 1222; People v Yakubov, 204 AD3d 1043, 1044).

The defendant's remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, without merit.

LASALLE, P.J., DILLON, CHRISTOPHER and LANDICINO, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Archer, 2025 NY Slip Op 03582 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2025).

2025 NY Slip Op 03582 (People v. Archer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Yakubov
165 N.Y.S.3d 355 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)