People v. Archer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Archer

236 A.D.2d 478, 654 N.Y.S.2d 591, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1173

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 10, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 236 A.D.2d 478 (People v. Archer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Archer, 236 A.D.2d 478, 654 N.Y.S.2d 591, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1173 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens [479]*479County (Eng, J.), rendered September 14, 1994, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, and unauthorized use of a vehicle in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The People proved by legally sufficient evidence that the value of the stolen van exceeded $3,000 at the time that it was recovered from the defendant’s possession (see, Penal Law §§ 165.50,155.20 [1]; People v Adams, 198 AD2d 545, 546; People v Esposito, 171 AD2d 807, 808), and therefore his contention that the conviction of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree must be reversed is without merit. Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, Copertino and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens [479]*479County (Eng, J.), rendered September 14, 1994, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, and unauthorized use of a vehicle in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The People proved by legally sufficient evidence that the value of the stolen van exceeded $3,000 at the time that it was recovered from the defendant’s possession (see, Penal Law §§ 165.50,155.20 [1]; People v Adams, 198 AD2d 545, 546; People v Esposito, 171 AD2d 807, 808), and therefore his contention that the conviction of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree must be reversed is without merit. Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, Copertino and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

236 A.D.2d 478, 654 N.Y.S.2d 591, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-archer-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack