People v. Arbi

143 A.D.3d 423, 38 N.Y.S.3d 417
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 4, 2016·No. 1804 544/13·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ronald A. Zweibel, J.), entered on or about August 14, 2014, which adjudicated defendant a level one sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly designated defendant a sexually violent offender because he was convicted of an enumerated offense, and the court lacked discretion to do otherwise (see People v Bullock, 125 AD3d 1 [1st Dept 2014], lv denied 24 NY3d 915 [2015]). We decline to revisit our holding in Bullock. Defendant’s due process argument is unpreserved and without merit.

Concur- — Friedman, J.P., Saxe, Moskowitz, Gische and Kahn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Arbi, 143 A.D.3d 423, 38 N.Y.S.3d 417 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

143 A.D.3d 423 (People v. Arbi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Bullock
125 A.D.3d 1 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)