People v. Aramas

250 A.D.2d 478, 672 N.Y.S.2d 702, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6191
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 19, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 250 A.D.2d 478 (People v. Aramas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Aramas, 250 A.D.2d 478, 672 N.Y.S.2d 702, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6191 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Vincent Vitale, J.), rendered March 8, 1989, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of six counts of murder in the second degree and one count each of robbery in the first degree, burglary in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to three consecutive terms of 25 years to life to run concurrently with three concurrent terms of 25 years to life, two concurrent terms of 12 V2 to 25 years, and a concurrent term of 7V2 to 15 years, unanimously affirmed.

By consenting to the joinder of defendant’s and the co-defendant’s indictment, by failing to request severance and by explicitly requesting a limiting instruction when the court admitted the statement of the non-testifying co-defendant, defendant has waived his present claim that he was denied the right of confrontation (see, People v Graham, 228 AD2d 299, lv denied 88 NY2d 985). In any event, given the overwhelming evidence of guilt, the Bruton error (Bruton v United States, 391 US 123) was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v Hamlin, 71 NY2d 750, 758).

Review of defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel would require a further record to be developed by way of an appropriate motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 (see, People v Love, 57 NY2d 998). Based on the existing record, we find defendant was afforded the effective assistance of counsel (see, People v Hobot, 84 NY2d 1021, 1024; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137).

We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur — Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Serrano
256 A.D.2d 175 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
250 A.D.2d 478, 672 N.Y.S.2d 702, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-aramas-nyappdiv-1998.