People v. Aragon

122 A.D.3d 871, 995 N.Y.S.2d 512
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 19, 2014
Docket2012-06087
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 122 A.D.3d 871 (People v. Aragon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Aragon, 122 A.D.3d 871, 995 N.Y.S.2d 512 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Cyrulnik, J.), imposed May 21, 2012, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, he knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738 [2006]). The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-267 [2011]; People v Ramos, 7 NY3d at 738; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]; People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 735 [1998]; People v Arteev, 120 AD3d 1255 [2014]).

Eng, EJ., Dillon, Sgroi and Maltese, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Eric P.
135 A.D.3d 882 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Knotts
130 A.D.3d 943 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
122 A.D.3d 871, 995 N.Y.S.2d 512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-aragon-nyappdiv-2014.