People v. Aquino Figueroa

79 P.R. 17
CourtSupreme Court of Puerto Rico
DecidedMarch 15, 1956
DocketNo. 16036
StatusPublished

This text of 79 P.R. 17 (People v. Aquino Figueroa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Puerto Rico primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Aquino Figueroa, 79 P.R. 17 (prsupreme 1956).

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Snyder

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The defendant was charged in the Superior Court with a violation of § 32 (a.) of Act No. 17 of January 19, 1951, known as the “Weapons Law of Puerto Rico”.1 He was tried by the court without a jury, convicted, and sentenced to a month in jail. On appeal he assigns two errors: (1) the trial court erred in weighing the evidence and in not giving the defendant the benefit of reasonable doubt; (2) since the facts show a violation of § 370 of the Penal Code, 1937 ed., and not of § 32 (a) of the Weapons Law, the trial court erred in not acquitting the defendant.

The first error was not committed. We need not analyze the evidence in detail. It is enough to say that the testimony presented by the People shows that without any justification the defendant discharged several shots from a revolver while on the sidewalk of a street in Añasco. The trial court did not believe the testimony of the witnesses for the defendant that the revolver went off while the defendant and one Eyton Arroyo were struggling for possession of the gun. We find no basis for interference with the weighing of the evidence by the trial court in this case.

[19]*19 As to the second error, we cannot agree that the facts show a violation of § 370 of the Penal Code rather than of § 32 (a) of the Weapons Law. Section 370 makes it a misdemeanor to use unlawfully a deadly weapon “in any fight or quarrel”.2 Here the testimony believed by the trial court was that the defendant was not engaged in any fight or quarrel when he discharged the revolver several times. The trial court therefore correctly decided that under those circumstances the facts constituted a violation of § 32(a) of the Weapons Law.3

The judgment of the Superior Court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
79 P.R. 17, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-aquino-figueroa-prsupreme-1956.