People v. Apple

7 Cal. 289
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1857
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 7 Cal. 289 (People v. Apple) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Apple, 7 Cal. 289 (Cal. 1857).

Opinion

Murray, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court—Burnett, J., concurring.

The appellant was convicted of an assault with the intent to commit murder. A motion for a new trial, and also in arrest of judgment, was made.

The errors assigned are, first, the admission of improper testimony; second, error in the instructions of the Court; third, insufficiency of the indictment; and fourth, that the verdict is not warranted by the evidence.

None of these assignments can be sustained. A general objection was interposed to the admission of the evidence complained of; this has been repeatedly held to be insufficient. The instructions are clear, forcible, and correct. The insufficiency of the indictment should have been taken advantage of by demurrer, and the evidence was sufficient to warrant the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Rosa
25 P.R. 833 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1917)
People v. París
25 P.R. 103 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1917)
People v. Chee Kee
61 Cal. 404 (California Supreme Court, 1882)
People ex rel. Jenkins v. Duncan
41 Cal. 507 (California Supreme Court, 1871)
People v. Glenn
10 Cal. 32 (California Supreme Court, 1858)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 Cal. 289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-apple-cal-1857.