People v. Aponte

254 A.D.2d 493, 679 N.Y.S.2d 838, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11239
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Aponte. Read the opinion of the Court — 249 A.D.2d 553

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Starkey, J.), rendered April 10, 1997, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention with respect to the trial court’s marshalling of the evidence is unpreserved for appellate review and we decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.

The defendant’s sentence was neither harsh nor excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Thompson, Sullivan and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Aponte, 254 A.D.2d 493, 679 N.Y.S.2d 838, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11239 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

254 A.D.2d 493 (People v. Aponte) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)