People v. Aponte

193 A.D.2d 529, 598 N.Y.S.2d 937, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5274
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Aponte. Read the opinion of the Court — 180 A.D.2d 910

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (David Stadtmauer, J., on summary denial of suppression motion and at trial and sentence), rendered March 24, 1991, convicting the defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree and sentencing him as a second felony offender to an indeterminate term of 2 Vi to 5 years in prison, unanimously held in abeyance and the matter remitted for a Mapp hearing.

The People’s answer to the defendant’s omnibus suppression motion set forth a sufficient factual basis for the police search of the defendant. However, contrary to the finding of the hearing court, defense counsel’s affirmation contained sufficient factual allegations to warrant a hearing (CPL 710.60; People v Huggins, 162 AD2d 129; People v Miller, 162 AD2d 248, lv dismissed 76 NY2d 895). Therefore, summary denial of defendant’s suppression motion was improper in this particular instance. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Rosenberger, Ross, Asch and Kassal, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Aponte, 193 A.D.2d 529, 598 N.Y.S.2d 937, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5274 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

193 A.D.2d 529 (People v. Aponte) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Huggins
162 A.D.2d 129 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
People v. Miller
162 A.D.2d 248 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)