People v. Aponte

120 A.D.2d 741, 502 N.Y.S.2d 662, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56867
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Aponte. Read the opinion of the Court — 140 A.D.2d 702

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from three judgments of the County Court, Nassau County (Winick, J.), all rendered August 8, 1984, convicting him of burglary in the second degree (five counts) and criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree under indictment No. 57625, burglary in the second degree under indictment No. 57527, and burglary in the second degree under indictment No. 57895, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Judgments affirmed.

As the defendant received the sentences for which he bargained, he may not now complain that they were excessive (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). We have considered the other contentions raised by the defendant and find them to be without merit. Gibbons, J. P., Eiber, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Aponte, 120 A.D.2d 741, 502 N.Y.S.2d 662, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56867 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

120 A.D.2d 741 (People v. Aponte) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Kazepis
101 A.D.2d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)