People v. Apodaca
This text of 571 P.2d 1109 (People v. Apodaca) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court.
Defendants Apodaca and Perez were convicted of second-degree burglary and felony theft. We granted certiorari to review the court of appeals’ reversal of defendants’ convictions due to the trial court’s failure to suppress illegally obtained evidence. People v. Apodaca, 38 Colo. App. *325 395, 561 P.2d 351 (1976).
The facts and law are fully discussed in the court of appeals opinion. We need only note that the defendants were convicted on evidence obtained as the result of a flashlight search of the interior of their car while it was parked in a carport behind their house. Until they looked into the car, the police officers had no reason to suspect that any crime had been committed and therefore they were not justified in searching the defendants’ car. See Stone v. People, 174 Colo. 504, 485 P.2d 495 (1971). Here, the defendants had a reasonable expectation of privacy which the police search violated. See People v. Johnson, 192 Colo. 483, 560 P.2d 465 (1977). The court of appeals correctly held that evidence obtained as a result of the illegal search and the ensuing illegal arrests should have been suppressed. People v. Boorem, 184 Colo. 233, 519 P.2d 939 (1974).
The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE KELLEY dissents.
MR. JUSTICE GROVES does not participate.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
571 P.2d 1109, 194 Colo. 324, 1977 Colo. LEXIS 837, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-apodaca-colo-1977.