People v. Aparo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Aparo

285 A.D. 1171, 140 N.Y.S.2d 542, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7040

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 16, 1955

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 285 A.D. 1171 (People v. Aparo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Aparo, 285 A.D. 1171, 140 N.Y.S.2d 542, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7040 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

Defendant appeals from a judgment of a City Magistrate of the City of Hew York, sitting as a Court of Special Sessions of the City of Hew York, Borough of Brooklyn, convicting him of knowingly permitting his premises to he used for gambling, in violation of section 973 of the Penal Law and from the sentence imposed. Judgment reversed on the law and the facts, complaint dismissed, and fine remitted. The proof adduced was insufficient to establish the commission of the crime. Defendant’s admissions without additional proof that reasonably tends to prove the crime are not sufficient to> warrant the conviction. (Code Grim. Pro., § 395.) Ho separate appeal lies1 from the sentence, which has been reviewed on the appeal from the judgment of conviction. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ., soncur..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Defendant appeals from a judgment of a City Magistrate of the City of Hew York, sitting as a Court of Special Sessions of the City of Hew York, Borough of Brooklyn, convicting him of knowingly permitting his premises to he used for gambling, in violation of section 973 of the Penal Law and from the sentence imposed. Judgment reversed on the law and the facts, complaint dismissed, and fine remitted. The proof adduced was insufficient to establish the commission of the crime. Defendant’s admissions without additional proof that reasonably tends to prove the crime are not sufficient to> warrant the conviction. (Code Grim. Pro., § 395.) Ho separate appeal lies1 from the sentence, which has been reviewed on the appeal from the judgment of conviction. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ., soncur..

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

285 A.D. 1171, 140 N.Y.S.2d 542, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7040, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-aparo-nyappdiv-1955.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack