People v. Antwi (Kwadwo)

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Antwi (Kwadwo)

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedSeptember 12, 2016

Docket2016 NYSlipOp 51275(U)

StatusPublished

This text of People v. Antwi (Kwadwo) (People v. Antwi (Kwadwo)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Antwi (Kwadwo), (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

The People of the Sta te of New York, Respondent,

against

Kwadwo Antwi, Defendant-Appellant.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Michelle A. Armstrong, J. at plea; Kevin B. McGrath, J. at re-plea and sentencing), rendered December 17, 2013, convicting him, upon a plea of guilty, of disorderly conduct, and imposing sentence.

Per Curiam.

Judgment of conviction (Michelle A. Armstrong, J. at plea; Kevin B. McGrath, J. at re-plea and sentencing), rendered December 17, 2013, affirmed.

Application by appellant's counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Saunders, 52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders, and, upon an independent review of the record, agree that there is no valid appealable issue that could be raised on appeal.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.

I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: September 12, 2016

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI