People v. Antunez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Antunez

142 A.D.3d 869, 37 N.Y.S.3d 876

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 27, 2016

Docket1712 3111N/12

StatusPublished

This text of 142 A.D.3d 869 (People v. Antunez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Antunez, 142 A.D.3d 869, 37 N.Y.S.3d 876 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bruce Allen, J.), rendered December 19, 2012, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him to a term of 45 days, unanimously affirmed.

Where, despite his prior expression of dissatisfaction with counsel, defendant expressly stated that he did not wish to withdraw his guilty plea and that he wanted his attorney to continue to represent him at sentencing, defendant abandoned any claims to the contrary (see People v Ragin, 136 AD3d 426 [1st Dept 2016], lv denied 27 NY3d 1074 [2016]), and the court had no reason to assign new counsel sua sponte. In any event, the record establishes the voluntariness of the plea and the absence of good cause for reassignment of counsel.

Concur— Friedman, J.P., Andrias, Richter, Gische and Kahn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bruce Allen, J.), rendered December 19, 2012, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him to a term of 45 days, unanimously affirmed.

Where, despite his prior expression of dissatisfaction with counsel, defendant expressly stated that he did not wish to withdraw his guilty plea and that he wanted his attorney to continue to represent him at sentencing, defendant abandoned any claims to the contrary (see People v Ragin, 136 AD3d 426 [1st Dept 2016], lv denied 27 NY3d 1074 [2016]), and the court had no reason to assign new counsel sua sponte. In any event, the record establishes the voluntariness of the plea and the absence of good cause for reassignment of counsel.

Concur— Friedman, J.P., Andrias, Richter, Gische and Kahn, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

142 A.D.3d 869, 37 N.Y.S.3d 876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-antunez-nyappdiv-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack