People v. Antinore
This text of 154 A.D.2d 920 (People v. Antinore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress his statement, which was taken without the presence of counsel. He asserts that his right to counsel had indelibly attached when the police obtained a search warrant. The issuance of the search warrant did not trigger defendant’s indelible right to counsel (see, People v Ferringer, 120 AD2d 101, 106).
We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Genesee County Court, Morton, J. — rape, third degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Boomer, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
154 A.D.2d 920, 545 N.Y.S.2d 873, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12948, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-antinore-nyappdiv-1989.