People v. Antinore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Antinore

154 A.D.2d 920, 545 N.Y.S.2d 873, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12948

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 6, 1989·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress his statement, which was taken without the presence of counsel. He asserts that his right to counsel had indelibly attached when the police obtained a search warrant. The issuance of the search warrant did not trigger defendant’s indelible right to counsel (see, People v Ferringer, 120 AD2d 101, 106).

We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Genesee County Court, Morton, J. — rape, third degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Boomer, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress his statement, which was taken without the presence of counsel. He asserts that his right to counsel had indelibly attached when the police obtained a search warrant. The issuance of the search warrant did not trigger defendant’s indelible right to counsel (see, People v Ferringer, 120 AD2d 101, 106).

We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Genesee County Court, Morton, J. — rape, third degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Boomer, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

People v. Antinore, 154 A.D.2d 920, 545 N.Y.S.2d 873, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12948 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

154 A.D.2d 920 (People v. Antinore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related