People v. Antinore

154 A.D.2d 920, 545 N.Y.S.2d 873, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12948
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 6, 1989
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 154 A.D.2d 920 (People v. Antinore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Antinore, 154 A.D.2d 920, 545 N.Y.S.2d 873, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12948 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress his statement, which was taken without the presence of counsel. He asserts that his right to counsel had indelibly attached when the police obtained a search warrant. The issuance of the search warrant did not trigger defendant’s indelible right to counsel (see, People v Ferringer, 120 AD2d 101, 106).

We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Genesee County Court, Morton, J. — rape, third degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Boomer, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Smith
234 A.D.2d 946 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
154 A.D.2d 920, 545 N.Y.S.2d 873, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12948, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-antinore-nyappdiv-1989.