People v. Anthony

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Anthony

132 A.D.3d 562, 17 N.Y.S.3d 869

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 22, 2015

Docket6093/10

StatusPublished

This text of 132 A.D.3d 562 (People v. Anthony) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Anthony, 132 A.D.3d 562, 17 N.Y.S.3d 869 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Rena K. Uviller, J.), rendered May 30, 2012, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing her to an aggregate term of 11 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s legal sufficiency claim is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we reject it on the merits. We also find that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v *563 Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s credibility determinations. The evidence supports the conclusion that defendant personally cut the victim and was accessorially liable for the acts of her codefendant (see People v Cabey, 85 NY2d 417 [1995]).

Concur—Sweeny, J.P., Renwick, Saxe and Gische, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Rena K. Uviller, J.), rendered May 30, 2012, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing her to an aggregate term of 11 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s legal sufficiency claim is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we reject it on the merits. We also find that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v *563 Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s credibility determinations. The evidence supports the conclusion that defendant personally cut the victim and was accessorially liable for the acts of her codefendant (see People v Cabey, 85 NY2d 417 [1995]).

Concur—Sweeny, J.P., Renwick, Saxe and Gische, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

132 A.D.3d 562, 17 N.Y.S.3d 869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-anthony-nyappdiv-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack