People v. Anthony

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Anthony

308 A.D.2d 399, 764 N.Y.S.2d 628, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9799

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 25, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 308 A.D.2d 399 (People v. Anthony) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Anthony, 308 A.D.2d 399, 764 N.Y.S.2d 628, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9799 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Denis Boyle, J.), rendered February 21, 2001, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to concurrent terms of 25 years to life, 25 years to life and 15 years to life, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight, of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning identification and credibility (see People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490 [1987]). Three witnesses, two of whom were acquainted with defendant, made reliable identifications. Concur — Saxe, J.P., Rosenberger, Williams, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Denis Boyle, J.), rendered February 21, 2001, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to concurrent terms of 25 years to life, 25 years to life and 15 years to life, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight, of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning identification and credibility (see People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490 [1987]). Three witnesses, two of whom were acquainted with defendant, made reliable identifications. Concur — Saxe, J.P., Rosenberger, Williams, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

308 A.D.2d 399, 764 N.Y.S.2d 628, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9799, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-anthony-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack