People v. Anthony
This text of 268 A.D. 805 (People v. Anthony) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by defendant-appellant from a judgment of conviction for violation of section 2010 of the Penal Law, namely, the crime of rape in the first degree. There is ample credible evidence to support the jury’s verdict of guilty, as charged in the indictment, and the judgment of conviction should be affirmed. Judgment of conviction affirmed. All concur, except Bliss, J., who dissents in the following memorandum: The trial court should have charged as requested by defendant with regard to complainant’s pregnancy being no corroboration of the crime. (People v. Whitson, 195 App. Div. 910, affd. on dissenting opinion of Cochrane, J., below, 234 N. Y. 517.) Also the proof shows that at most defendant was guilty of second degree rape only.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
268 A.D. 805, 48 N.Y.S.2d 620, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3559, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-anthony-nyappdiv-1944.