People v. Anthony D.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Anthony D.

199 A.D.2d 331, 606 N.Y.S.2d 992

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 13, 1993·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Douglass, J.), imposed November 30, 1992.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

Appellate review of the issue raised by the defendant was effectively waived by him as part of his plea bargain (see, People v Allen, 82 NY2d 761; People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1).

We have, however, examined the defendant’s contention that his sentence was excessive and find it to be without merit (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mangano, P. J., Thompson, O’Brien, Ritter and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Douglass, J.), imposed November 30, 1992.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

Appellate review of the issue raised by the defendant was effectively waived by him as part of his plea bargain (see, People v Allen, 82 NY2d 761; People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1).

We have, however, examined the defendant’s contention that his sentence was excessive and find it to be without merit (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mangano, P. J., Thompson, O’Brien, Ritter and Santucci, JJ., concur.

People v. Anthony D., 199 A.D.2d 331, 606 N.Y.S.2d 992 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

199 A.D.2d 331 (People v. Anthony D.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related