People v. Anthony C.

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Anthony C.

29 N.E.3d 235, 25 N.Y.3d 937, 6 N.Y.S.3d 226, 2015 NY Slip Op 02678, 2015 N.Y. LEXIS 660

New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 31, 2015·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The Appellate Division opinion does not suggest a misapprehension or misapplication of its authority to review youthful offender adjudications for abuse of discretion (CPL 720.20 [1] [a]), or under its broad interest-of-justice jurisdiction (see CPL 470.15 [6] [b]; People v Dawn Maria C., 67 NY2d 625, 627 [1986]).

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein and Fahey concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The Appellate Division opinion does not suggest a misapprehension or misapplication of its authority to review youthful offender adjudications for abuse of discretion (CPL 720.20 [1] [a]), or under its broad interest-of-justice jurisdiction (see CPL 470.15 [6] [b]; People v Dawn Maria C., 67 NY2d 625, 627 [1986]).

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein and Fahey concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, in a memorandum.

People v. Anthony C., 29 N.E.3d 235, 25 N.Y.3d 937, 6 N.Y.S.3d 226, 2015 NY Slip Op 02678, 2015 N.Y. LEXIS 660 (N.Y. 2015).

Pincite

29 N.E.3d 235 (People v. Anthony C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related