People v. Anthony C.

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Anthony C.

29 N.E.3d 235, 25 N.Y.3d 937, 6 N.Y.S.3d 226, 2015 NY Slip Op 02678, 2015 N.Y. LEXIS 660

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 31, 2015

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 29 N.E.3d 235 (People v. Anthony C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Anthony C., 29 N.E.3d 235, 25 N.Y.3d 937, 6 N.Y.S.3d 226, 2015 NY Slip Op 02678, 2015 N.Y. LEXIS 660 (N.Y. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The Appellate Division opinion does not suggest a misapprehension or misapplication of its authority to review youthful offender adjudications for abuse of discretion (CPL 720.20 [1] [a]), or under its broad interest-of-justice jurisdiction (see CPL 470.15 [6] [b]; People v Dawn Maria C., 67 NY2d 625, 627 [1986]).

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein and Fahey concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI