People v. Anonymous

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Anonymous

2017 NY Slip Op 413, 146 A.D.3d 617, 44 N.Y.S.3d 762

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 19, 2017

Docket2813 2088N/13

StatusPublished

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 413 (People v. Anonymous) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Anonymous, 2017 NY Slip Op 413, 146 A.D.3d 617, 44 N.Y.S.3d 762 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert M. Stolz, J., at plea; James M. Burke, J., at sentencing), rendered October 8, 2014, convicting defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of five years, with three years’ postrelease supervision, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of reducing the prison terms to concurrent terms of three years, and otherwise affirmed.

*618 We do not find that defendant made a valid waiver of his right to appeal, and we find the sentence excessive to the extent indicated.

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Renwick, Richter, Moskow-itz and Kapnick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert M. Stolz, J., at plea; James M. Burke, J., at sentencing), rendered October 8, 2014, convicting defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of five years, with three years’ postrelease supervision, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of reducing the prison terms to concurrent terms of three years, and otherwise affirmed.

*618 We do not find that defendant made a valid waiver of his right to appeal, and we find the sentence excessive to the extent indicated.

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Renwick, Richter, Moskow-itz and Kapnick, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2017 NY Slip Op 413, 146 A.D.3d 617, 44 N.Y.S.3d 762, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-anonymous-nyappdiv-2017.