People v. Annunziata

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Annunziata

112 A.D.2d 242, 491 N.Y.S.2d 598, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55986

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Annunziata. Read the opinion of the Court — 105 A.D.2d 709 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 8, 1985·Published

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Weissman, J.), rendered April 14, 1982, adjudging him to be in violation of probation, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Amended judgment affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues that could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Lazer, J. P., Gibbons, Weinstein and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Weissman, J.), rendered April 14, 1982, adjudging him to be in violation of probation, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Amended judgment affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues that could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Lazer, J. P., Gibbons, Weinstein and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

People v. Annunziata, 112 A.D.2d 242, 491 N.Y.S.2d 598, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55986 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

112 A.D.2d 242 (People v. Annunziata) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related