People v. Anglin
This text of 233 A.D.2d 403 (People v. Anglin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Berry, J.), rendered May 1, 1995, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s argument concerning the alleged ineffective assistance of his counsel is without merit (see, People v Rivera, 71 NY2d 705; People v Wood, 150 AD2d 411; People v Hayes, 186 AD2d 268). The defendant’s remaining argument is unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636) and, in any event, is without merit (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Thompson and McGinity, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
233 A.D.2d 403, 650 N.Y.S.2d 578, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11549, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-anglin-nyappdiv-1996.