People v. Angel E.

233 A.D.2d 938, 649 N.Y.S.2d 878, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13480
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 8, 1996·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Adjudication unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant’s contention that reversal is required because County Court’s finding of a violation of probation is based solely on hearsay evidence is not preserved for our review (see, People v Park, 203 AD2d 596, lv denied 84 NY2d 830), and we decline to exercise our power to review that contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). (Appeal from Adjudication of Monroe County Court, Bristol, J.—Youthful Offender.) Present—Pine, J. P., Fallon, Wesley, Davis and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Angel E., 233 A.D.2d 938, 649 N.Y.S.2d 878, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13480 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

233 A.D.2d 938 (People v. Angel E.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

WASHINGTON, BRYAN, PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015
People v. Brown
254 A.D.2d 793 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)