People v. Andujar

293 A.D.2d 685, 740 N.Y.S.2d 636, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3969
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Andujar. Read the opinion of the Court — 290 A.D.2d 654

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barbare, J.), rendered May 2, 2000, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, assault in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]). Santucci, J.P., Feuerstein, S. Miller and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Andujar, 293 A.D.2d 685, 740 N.Y.S.2d 636, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3969 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

293 A.D.2d 685 (People v. Andujar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)