People v. Andujar

254 A.D.2d 178, 679 N.Y.S.2d 300, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11152

This text of 254 A.D.2d 178 (People v. Andujar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Andujar, 254 A.D.2d 178, 679 N.Y.S.2d 300, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11152 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bernard Fried, J.), rendered February 27, 1997, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4V2 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). We see no reason to disturb the jury’s findings [179]*179concerning reliability of identification testimony. Concur— Milonas, J. P., Williams, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
254 A.D.2d 178, 679 N.Y.S.2d 300, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-andujar-nyappdiv-1998.