People v. Andujar

105 A.D.2d 708, 489 N.Y.S.2d 858, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20816
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Andujar. Read the opinion of the Court — 110 A.D.2d 606

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Maraño, J.), rendered May 17, 1983, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fourth degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

The limited inquiry made by the court prior to denying defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea was appropriate and, under the circumstances, it was within the court’s discretion to deny the motion without a formal hearing (see People v Tinsley, 35 NY2d 926). Niehoff, J. P., Boyers, Lawrence and Fiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Andujar, 105 A.D.2d 708, 489 N.Y.S.2d 858, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20816 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

105 A.D.2d 708 (People v. Andujar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Tinsley
324 N.E.2d 544 (New York Court of Appeals, 1974)