People v. Andriani

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Andriani

264 A.D. 788, 34 N.Y.S.2d 861, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4735

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 18, 1942·Published

Opinion

Judgment of a city magistrate, holding a Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Borough of Queens, convicting the defendant of a violation of section 986 of the Penal Law (bookmaking), unanimously affirmed. The evidence must be evaluated in the Hght of the concession made at the close of the [789]*789People’s case. As thus appraised, it clearly appears that the defendant violated section 986 of the Penal Law in so far as that section relates to bookmaking, and also in so far as it relates to the possession of papers and paraphernalia for the purpose of recording or registering bets or wagers on horse races. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of a city magistrate, holding a Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Borough of Queens, convicting the defendant of a violation of section 986 of the Penal Law (bookmaking), unanimously affirmed. The evidence must be evaluated in the Hght of the concession made at the close of the [789]*789People’s case. As thus appraised, it clearly appears that the defendant violated section 986 of the Penal Law in so far as that section relates to bookmaking, and also in so far as it relates to the possession of papers and paraphernalia for the purpose of recording or registering bets or wagers on horse races. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

People v. Andriani, 264 A.D. 788, 34 N.Y.S.2d 861, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4735 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

264 A.D. 788 (People v. Andriani) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.