People v. Andrews

193 A.D.2d 1137, 600 N.Y.S.2d 652
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Andrews. Read the opinion of the Court — 176 A.D.2d 530
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 28, 1993·No. Appeal No. 1·Published

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant [1138]*1138knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see, People v Saunders, 190 AD2d 1092). Defendant does not contend that the waiver was constitutionally defective and there is no public policy impediment to enforcing it. Thus, we affirm based on the absence of any reviewable issues that survive the waiver (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273, 285). Were we to review the merits, we would conclude that the court’s denial of youthful offender status was not an abuse of discretion and that the sentence imposed was not harsh and excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, Drury, J.—Robbery, 2nd Degree.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Green, Pine, Fallon and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Andrews, 193 A.D.2d 1137, 600 N.Y.S.2d 652 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

193 A.D.2d 1137 (People v. Andrews) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Callahan
80 N.Y.2d 273 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
People v. Saunders
190 A.D.2d 1092 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)