People v. Andreu

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Andreu

101 A.D.2d 890, 475 N.Y.S.2d 808, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18607

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 29, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 101 A.D.2d 890 (People v. Andreu) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Andreu, 101 A.D.2d 890, 475 N.Y.S.2d 808, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18607 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Siedlecki, J.), rendered December 6, 1982, convicting him of murder in the second degree (two counts), and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and sentencing him to two consecutive terms of imprisonment of 25 years to life, to run concurrent with a term of imprisonment of 5 to 15 years. H Judgment modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the sentence imposed to two concurrent terms of imprisonment of 25 years to life, to run concurrent with the terms of imprisonment of 5 to 15 years. As so modified, judgment affirmed. 11 Under the circumstances, the terms of imprisonment imposed should run concurrently (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Lazer, J. P., Bracken, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Siedlecki, J.), rendered December 6, 1982, convicting him of murder in the second degree (two counts), and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and sentencing him to two consecutive terms of imprisonment of 25 years to life, to run concurrent with a term of imprisonment of 5 to 15 years. H Judgment modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the sentence imposed to two concurrent terms of imprisonment of 25 years to life, to run concurrent with the terms of imprisonment of 5 to 15 years. As so modified, judgment affirmed. 11 Under the circumstances, the terms of imprisonment imposed should run concurrently (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Lazer, J. P., Bracken, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

101 A.D.2d 890, 475 N.Y.S.2d 808, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-andreu-nyappdiv-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack