People v. Andrade

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Andrade

2016 NY Slip Op 7306, 144 A.D.3d 775, 40 N.Y.S.3d 272

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Andrade. Read the opinion of the Court — 124 A.D.3d 533 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 9, 2016·No. 2010-09109·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Kahn, J.), dated August 6, 2010, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant’s assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252 [2011]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).

Chambers, J.P., Dickerson, Miller and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Kahn, J.), dated August 6, 2010, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant’s assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252 [2011]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).

Chambers, J.P., Dickerson, Miller and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.

People v. Andrade, 2016 NY Slip Op 7306, 144 A.D.3d 775, 40 N.Y.S.3d 272 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

2016 NY Slip Op 7306 (People v. Andrade) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related