People v. Anderson

299 A.D.2d 555, 750 N.Y.S.2d 522
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Anderson. Read the opinion of the Court — 270 A.D.2d 509

Opinion

Appeals by the defendant from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Erlbaum, J.), rendered June 4, 2001, convicting him of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree under Indictment No. 11139/00, and (2) a judgment of the same court (Wong, J.), rendered June 6, 2001, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree under Superior Court Information No. 10413/01, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on the appeals. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Santucci, J.P., Smith, Goldstein, H. Miller and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Anderson, 299 A.D.2d 555, 750 N.Y.S.2d 522 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

299 A.D.2d 555 (People v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)