People v. Anderson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Anderson

63 A.D.2d 1031, 406 N.Y.S.2d 989, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12123

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 26, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 63 A.D.2d 1031 (People v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Anderson, 63 A.D.2d 1031, 406 N.Y.S.2d 989, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12123 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered July 7, 1977, convicting her of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing concurrent sentences of imprisonment with a minimum of six years and a maximum of life. Judgment modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the minimum period of incarceration of each sentence to two years. As so modified, judgment affirmed. The sentences were excessive to the extent indicated herein. Appellant’s other contentions have been considered and have been found to be without merit. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Suozzi, Shapiro and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered July 7, 1977, convicting her of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing concurrent sentences of imprisonment with a minimum of six years and a maximum of life. Judgment modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the minimum period of incarceration of each sentence to two years. As so modified, judgment affirmed. The sentences were excessive to the extent indicated herein. Appellant’s other contentions have been considered and have been found to be without merit. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Suozzi, Shapiro and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

63 A.D.2d 1031, 406 N.Y.S.2d 989, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-anderson-nyappdiv-1978.