People v. Anderson
This text of 25 A.D.2d 602 (People v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment unanimously reversed op the law and facts [603]*603and new trial granted. Memorandum: After the indictment had been returned against appellant proof was submitted to another Grand Jury against one Corcoran, who, it is claimed, was a participant in the assault upon Kavanaugh, the complainant herein. Upon the trial of appellant his counsel was denied the transcript of the Grand Jury testimony of Kavanaugh and another witness in the proceeding against Corcoran. Following argument of this appeal we examined the Grand Jury testimony in question and permitted appellant’s counsel to do so and comment thereon. We conclude that the denial of the transcript was substantial error (People v. Malinsky, 15 N Y 2d 86; People v. Rosario, 9 N Y 2d 286; People v. Askew, 15 A D 2d 727). (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court convicting defendant of assault, second degree.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 A.D.2d 602, 267 N.Y.S.2d 727, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-anderson-nyappdiv-1966.