People v. Anderson

Michigan Supreme Court

People v. Anderson

209 N.W. 64, 235 Mich. 336, 1926 Mich. LEXIS 705

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedJune 7, 1926

DocketDocket No. 152.

StatusPublished

This text of 209 N.W. 64 (People v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Anderson, 209 N.W. 64, 235 Mich. 336, 1926 Mich. LEXIS 705 (Mich. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Defendant's exceptions challenge his conviction of having possessed intoxicating liquor unlawfully on the ground that no case of possession, in fact, was made against him. The point was not raised during the trial by motion, request, or otherwise. It is attempted after verdict by motion to set aside verdict and to arrest judgment. It may not be so raised.Tishhouse v. Schoenberg, 234 Mich. 271; 34 C. J. p. 39. A consideration of the merits would not change the result.

Affirmed, and remanded for judgment.

BIRD, C.J., and SHARPE, SNOW, STEERE, FELLOWS, WIEST, and McDONALD, JJ., concurred. *Page 337

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Defendant's exceptions challenge his conviction of having possessed intoxicating liquor unlawfully on the ground that no case of possession, in fact, was made against him. The point was not raised during the trial by motion, request, or otherwise. It is attempted after verdict by motion to set aside verdict and to arrest judgment. It may not be so raised.Tishhouse v. Schoenberg, 234 Mich. 271; 34 C. J. p. 39. A consideration of the merits would not change the result.

Affirmed, and remanded for judgment.

BIRD, C.J., and SHARPE, SNOW, STEERE, FELLOWS, WIEST, and McDONALD, JJ., concurred. *Page 337

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

209 N.W. 64, 235 Mich. 336, 1926 Mich. LEXIS 705, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-anderson-mich-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack