People v. Anderson

566 P.2d 1369, 39 Colo. App. 497
CourtColorado Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 7, 1977
Docket76-767
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 566 P.2d 1369 (People v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Colorado Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Anderson, 566 P.2d 1369, 39 Colo. App. 497 (Colo. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

566 P.2d 1369 (1977)

The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
David Lee ANDERSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 76-767.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. II.

July 7, 1977.

J. D. MacFarlane, Atty. Gen., Jean E. Dubofsky, Deputy Atty. Gen., Edward G. Donovan, Sol. Gen., Deborah L. Bianco, J. Stephen Phillips, Asst. Attys. Gen., Denver, for plaintiff-appellee.

Allen, Kordick & Wise, Lloyd C. Kordick, Colorado Springs, for defendant-appellant.

ENOCH, Judge.

Defendant, David Lee Anderson, has appealed his conviction of theft and his sentencing as an habitual criminal. Prior to oral arguments on this appeal, defendant escaped from the penitentiary at Canyon City, and remains at large. The People moved to vacate oral arguments, which motion was granted over the objection of defendant's attorney. The People now move that the appeal be dismissed. No response has been filed by defendant's attorney.

The course to be followed when a defendant escapes while his appeal is pending is within the sound discretion of the appellate court, absent a specific statutory procedure. Smith v. United States, 94 U.S. 97, 24 L.Ed. 32. Disposition by dismissal of pending appeals of escaped prisoners is a long-established principle of American law. Estelle v. Dorrough, 420 U.S. 534, 95 S.Ct. 1173, 43 L.Ed.2d 377. We find no persuasive reason to adjudicate the merits of defendant's case when he is not subject to the jurisdiction of the court.

It is therefore the judgment of this court that this appeal be and hereby is dismissed, provided, however, the defendant may apply to this court for leave to reinstate the appeal upon his return to custody. The record on file with this court shall be returned immediately to the trial court.

Appeal dismissed.

PIERCE and RULAND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Hentges
844 N.W.2d 500 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2014)
People v. Brown
250 P.3d 679 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 2010)
People v. Brewster
240 P.3d 291 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 2009)
State of Maryland Deposit Insurance Fund Corp. v. Billman
580 A.2d 1044 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1990)
City of Laramie v. Cowden
777 P.2d 1089 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
566 P.2d 1369, 39 Colo. App. 497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-anderson-coloctapp-1977.