People v. Anastasi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Anastasi

60 A.D.2d 654, 400 N.Y.S.2d 557, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14656

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 27, 1977

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 60 A.D.2d 654 (People v. Anastasi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Anastasi, 60 A.D.2d 654, 400 N.Y.S.2d 557, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14656 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County, imposed September 12, 1977, upon his conviction of attempted possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, the sentence being a period of imprisonment of 60 days, plus an additional period of probation of 4 years and 10 months. Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing it to a conditional discharge for a period of three years, and case remitted to the Criminal Term to fix the conditions of the sentence and for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). In the light of defendant’s previous unblemished record, and the extreme provocation under which he acted, a sentence of conditional discharge should have been imposed. Hargett, J. P., Damiani, Rabin and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County, imposed September 12, 1977, upon his conviction of attempted possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, the sentence being a period of imprisonment of 60 days, plus an additional period of probation of 4 years and 10 months. Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing it to a conditional discharge for a period of three years, and case remitted to the Criminal Term to fix the conditions of the sentence and for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). In the light of defendant’s previous unblemished record, and the extreme provocation under which he acted, a sentence of conditional discharge should have been imposed. Hargett, J. P., Damiani, Rabin and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 A.D.2d 654, 400 N.Y.S.2d 557, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14656, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-anastasi-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack